Contract research
organizations.
For CROs whose scientific depth shapes every sponsor conversation. Sponsor-grade thinking, made visible and defensible.
// Where the work breaks
Three problems
Three problems
on every engagement.
CROs already shape the science. Medical writing, biostatistics, regulatory affairs, and clinical operations teams carry deep therapeutic and operational expertise into every program. What has shifted is what sponsors now want to see of that work, and how early in the conversation.
P / 01
Design-tier work is the front door of every bid now.
Sponsors increasingly evaluate CROs on the design work, endpoints, eligibility, statistical strategy, not only on execution. The teams already shaping that work deserve a platform that compounds what they have learned across trials.
~65% Of CRO revenue tied to operations the design tier already shapes
P / 02
Modern infrastructure is the new baseline.
AI and modern infrastructure are moving from differentiator to baseline. The CRO that stays current with the tools the work runs on stays current with the work itself.
~30% Of sponsor RFPs now include explicit AI and infrastructure questions
P / 03
Every sponsor brings their own design conventions.
Each engagement carries its own design specifications, formatting conventions, and review preferences. Writer and reviewer hours go to translating the same scientific depth into the shape each sponsor expects.
~30% Of design-tier hours spent translating between sponsor specifications and formats
// What changes
We change that, by putting modern infrastructure inside the work, opening a trial-design service line for the CROs not already there and by giving every bid a defensible design artifact, ready upon sponsor request.
// Target outcomes
The service line, re-rated.
Sized against a CRO design tier, medical writing, biostatistics, and regulatory affairs working together across roughly forty protocols a year. Baselines are unit-specific. The pattern holds across global and specialty CROs.
+8 pts
Gross margin uplift on the service line
~25% → ~33% · same delivery scope
50%
Sponsor queries per protocol delivered
Pooled across deployed cohorts · vs. unit baseline
+9 pts
Bid win rate on protocol-bundled RFPs
vs. prior year · same RFP volume
6 wks
Median delivery time to sponsor sign-off
Across all phases · net of sponsor review